Skip to content
Carmel Rickard writes…
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Site Search

The law that refused to die

  • 6 September 201924 September 2019
  • by Carmel Rickard

S v Mafudza (CR 63/2019) [2019] NAHCMD 323 (05 September 2019)

Judge President Damaseb and Acting Judge Sibeya

The two judges were considering a magistrate’s conviction and sentence and were astonished to find that the accused had been charged and fined for a non-existent offence. The accused was charged with contravening a section of the law that had been repealed more than 20 years earlier. When they asked the magistrate for an explanation, they were told that the public prosecutor blamed the Namibian Courts Information System (NAMCIS).

Launched in 2008, the NAMCIS project automates some of the courts’ administrative functions. The magistrate who presided in the case said the conviction and sentence were not competent in law and could not be allowed to stand.

The judges commented:

Eighteen years after the repeal it is discouraging to realise that the Road Traffic Ordinance refuses to be scrapped from Court proceedings, with the assistance of public prosecutors and magistrates. … The magistrate appears to have simply followed the charge as presented by the prosecutor. It should be understood that prosecutors are essential to the attainment of justice in the criminal justice system. They should thus draft charges with professionalism, precision and, where the offence is statutory, the charge should reflect the wording … in the statutory provision with the correct and valid legislation establishing the offence. Magistrates should also carefully examine charges to ensure (they) are valid.’

Read judgment

*Newsletter, Judicial Institute for Africa (Jifa), 6 September 2019

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Husband’s right to ‘rule over his wife’ – it’s gone!
What sentence when brother kills brother?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Carmel Rickard writes... via email. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Tags

CCMA (3) chief justice (3) Commercial court (2) constitution (5) constitutional and human rights division (3) constitutional court (4) constitutional rights (5) corruption (3) Court of Appeal (4) Covid-19 (6) COVID-19 regulations (3) damages (3) death penalty (5) dismissal (2) Employment law (6) eSwatini (2) Gauteng (3) Ghana (3) high court (23) Judge John Mativo (2) judicial independence (3) judicial review (3) Judicial Service Commission (3) jurisdiction (3) Kenya (15) Law Society of Kenya (3) Lesotho (5) magistrate (5) Malawi (8) Namibia (13) Rwanda (2) SA (4) SA Constitutional Court (2) SADC Tribunal (2) SA Labour Court (2) security forces (4) sentencing (4) South Africa (4) Supreme Court (11) Tanzania (7) torture (4) Uganda (9) UK (2) Zambia (6) Zimbabwe (14)

Recent Posts

  • Preserve your independence, court urges Namibia’s election commission 19 July 2020
  • African Court tells Tanzania: your constitution violates basic rights 16 July 2020
  • Government’s ‘contempt’ raised in challenge to Tanzania’s bail-ban laws 22 May 2020
  • Malawi appeal court judges set new election standards 22 May 2020
  • What orders did the court issue in the case brought by the family of Collins Khosa? 16 May 2020

Archive

Site by Neogek
Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress
 Logo Header Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

Subscribe to Carmel Rickard writes... via email. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.