Skip to content
Carmel Rickard writes…
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Site Search

Chief Justices from southern Africa offer help to resolve Swazi judicial crisis

  • 24 April 201527 December 2018
  • by Carmel Rickard

Chief Justice of Namibia, Peter Shivute, has offered the help of the Southern African Chief Justices Forum to resolve the Swazi judicial crisis.

Shivute issued the offer in his capacity as chair of that forum, as the crisis in Swaziland continued.

According to the Times of Swaziland, bail was granted on Thursday 23 April to two judges, arrested earlier in the week, as well as to the registrar of the high court. The former minister of justice, arrested at the same time, has been refused bail. However, the chief justice of Swaziland, Michael Ramodibedi, continues to defy an arrest warrant. As police wait outside the arrest him, he remains inside his home and refuses to leave.

Shivute says that the forum has been following events in Swaziland and urges the authorities in that country to make sure that they apply the rule of law in the situation.

The forum encouraged the authorities to ensure that the chief justice and the other judges involved are accorded all their rights including the right to be represented by counsel of their choice.

‘Above all the matter needs to be handled in accordance with the law and in a way that preserves and reinforces the independence, integrity and dignity of the courts, and reinforces rather than undermines separation of powers and the rule of law,’ he said.

He said the form also affirmed the principle of equality before the law as sacrosanct for the maintenance of public confidence in the administration of justice, and concluded, ‘The SACJF stands ready to offer its counsel to the authorities in Swaziland to help in resolving this matter.’

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Somali hijack of vessel causes global legal conundrum
Rough Guide to Swaziland’s judicial scandal

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Carmel Rickard writes... via email. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Tags

CCMA (3) chief justice (3) Commercial court (2) constitution (5) constitutional and human rights division (3) constitutional court (4) constitutional rights (5) corruption (3) Court of Appeal (4) Covid-19 (6) COVID-19 regulations (3) damages (3) death penalty (5) dismissal (2) Employment law (6) eSwatini (2) Gauteng (3) Ghana (3) high court (23) Judge John Mativo (2) judicial independence (3) judicial review (3) Judicial Service Commission (3) jurisdiction (3) Kenya (15) Law Society of Kenya (3) Lesotho (5) magistrate (5) Malawi (8) Namibia (13) Rwanda (2) SA (4) SA Constitutional Court (2) SADC Tribunal (2) SA Labour Court (2) security forces (4) sentencing (4) South Africa (4) Supreme Court (11) Tanzania (7) torture (4) Uganda (9) UK (2) Zambia (6) Zimbabwe (14)

Recent Posts

  • Preserve your independence, court urges Namibia’s election commission 19 July 2020
  • African Court tells Tanzania: your constitution violates basic rights 16 July 2020
  • Government’s ‘contempt’ raised in challenge to Tanzania’s bail-ban laws 22 May 2020
  • Malawi appeal court judges set new election standards 22 May 2020
  • What orders did the court issue in the case brought by the family of Collins Khosa? 16 May 2020

Archive

Site by Neogek
Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress
 Logo Header Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

Subscribe to Carmel Rickard writes... via email. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.