Skip to content
Carmel Rickard writes…
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Site Search

Charge the government, high court suggests to prosecutor bosses

  • 25 June 201513 December 2018
  • by Carmel Rickard

When the South African government facilitated the departure of Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir last week it did so in flagrant defiance of a high court order that he not be allowed to leave the country.
It’s no exaggeration to say this has all the makings of a constitutional crisis.
Delivering judgment yesterday, Judge President Dunstan Mlambo made it clear that the government was not only in breach of its international obligations, but that it had been in clear breach of our own constitution and other laws.
In his judgment, delivered as part of a full bench of three concurring judges, he invited the prosecution services to consider charging the government as a result of its defiance of the court order.
The final paragraph of the decision reads as follows: “We stated earlier that the departure of President Bashir from this country before the finalisation of this application and in the full awareness of the explicit order of Sunday 14 June 2015, objectively viewed, demonstrates noncompliance with that order. For this reason we also find it prudent to invite the NDPP to consider whether criminal proceedings are appropriate.”

This is obviously far from the end of the matter.

Want to read for yourself how the court arrived at the conclusion that the government acted unlawfully – breaking South African law and international law – by helping President al-Bashir skip the country in defiance of a court order? You’ll find the full text of this important judgment below.

Southern Africa Litigation Centre v Minister Justice and Constitutional Development

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Will someone report high court judge in adultery case to the Judicial Service Commission?
Prison warden hero in “worst case since democracy”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Carmel Rickard writes... via email. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Tags

CCMA (3) chief justice (3) Commercial court (2) constitution (5) constitutional and human rights division (3) constitutional court (4) constitutional rights (5) corruption (3) Court of Appeal (4) Covid-19 (6) COVID-19 regulations (3) damages (3) death penalty (5) dismissal (2) Employment law (6) eSwatini (2) Gauteng (3) Ghana (3) high court (23) Judge John Mativo (2) judicial independence (3) judicial review (3) Judicial Service Commission (3) jurisdiction (3) Kenya (15) Law Society of Kenya (3) Lesotho (5) magistrate (5) Malawi (8) Namibia (13) Rwanda (2) SA (4) SA Constitutional Court (2) SADC Tribunal (2) SA Labour Court (2) security forces (4) sentencing (4) South Africa (4) Supreme Court (11) Tanzania (7) torture (4) Uganda (9) UK (2) Zambia (6) Zimbabwe (14)

Recent Posts

  • Preserve your independence, court urges Namibia’s election commission 19 July 2020
  • African Court tells Tanzania: your constitution violates basic rights 16 July 2020
  • Government’s ‘contempt’ raised in challenge to Tanzania’s bail-ban laws 22 May 2020
  • Malawi appeal court judges set new election standards 22 May 2020
  • What orders did the court issue in the case brought by the family of Collins Khosa? 16 May 2020

Archive

Site by Neogek
Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress
 Logo Header Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

Subscribe to Carmel Rickard writes... via email. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.