Skip to content
Carmel Rickard writes…
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Site Search

“We don’t need to sit in judgment over pots, chickens and turkeys” – judge

  • 4 March 201924 March 2019
  • by Carmel Rickard

Maware v Chiware

The couple in this case were separating after 31 years in an unregistered customary law union, and could not agree how to divide their assets.

At a pre-trial conference, Judge Garainesu Mawadze of the high court in Harare, Zimbabwe, helped the separating couple – both school-teachers, though the man had progressed to the post of headmaster – to deal with most of their disputed assets. Later, during a full trial lasting two days, Judge Martin Mafusire had to decide on division of the remaining items. He began his decision by noting what had been agreed up to that point via the pre-trial conference.

Of the 10 goats, both would get five. The building materials, including asbestos sheets and window and door frames were all divided according to the pre-trial agreement. The household goods and effects were also split up: one table, three chairs, four blankets, seven pots, water tins, dishes, plates, 10 chickens, five turkeys and a display unit were all to go to the woman.

Judge Mfusire then added, “In passing I make the comment that for a whole machinery of justice to be called upon to sit in judgment over pots, plates, chickens and turkeys, items over which the parties  reasonably ought to have agreed between themselves and their legal practitioners, betrayed unnecessary stubbornness and vindictiveness.”

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Tags: division of assets, Judge Garainseu Mawadze, Judge Martin Mafusire, Zimbabwe
Don’t use “constitution” as a “mantra”, warns Malawi’s Supreme Court
Challenging culture of impunity in Kenya

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Carmel Rickard writes... via email. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Tags

CCMA (3) chief justice (3) Commercial court (2) constitution (5) constitutional and human rights division (3) constitutional court (4) constitutional rights (5) corruption (3) Court of Appeal (4) Covid-19 (6) COVID-19 regulations (3) damages (3) death penalty (5) dismissal (2) Employment law (6) eSwatini (2) Gauteng (3) Ghana (3) high court (23) Judge John Mativo (2) judicial independence (3) judicial review (3) Judicial Service Commission (3) jurisdiction (3) Kenya (15) Law Society of Kenya (3) Lesotho (5) magistrate (5) Malawi (8) Namibia (13) Rwanda (2) SA (4) SA Constitutional Court (2) SADC Tribunal (2) SA Labour Court (2) security forces (4) sentencing (4) South Africa (4) Supreme Court (11) Tanzania (7) torture (4) Uganda (9) UK (2) Zambia (6) Zimbabwe (14)

Recent Posts

  • Preserve your independence, court urges Namibia’s election commission 19 July 2020
  • African Court tells Tanzania: your constitution violates basic rights 16 July 2020
  • Government’s ‘contempt’ raised in challenge to Tanzania’s bail-ban laws 22 May 2020
  • Malawi appeal court judges set new election standards 22 May 2020
  • What orders did the court issue in the case brought by the family of Collins Khosa? 16 May 2020

Archive

Site by Neogek
Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress
 Logo Header Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

Subscribe to Carmel Rickard writes... via email. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.