Skip to content
Carmel Rickard writes…
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Site Search

‘Deplorable conduct’ from chambers of Malawi’s AG – judge

  • 16 April 202022 April 2020
  • by Carmel Rickard

In Their Own Words:  

Read judgment in Mponda v President

Judge Zione Ntaba, High Court, Malawi

This case dealt with an application by four law students who challenged the validity of Malawi’s Covid-19-related restrictions and asked that these restrictions, and the legislation in terms of which they were promulgated, be reviewed by the court. Before she reached the legal issues raised by the students, however, Judge Zione Ntaba had something to say about the fact that no legal representatives of the government, the university or the attorney general were in court to appear before her when the case was argued. She was particularly concerned given the significance of the matter to be argued. And she was definitely not impressed with the excuse provided.

The Respondents did not appear on the date of hearing for the inter partes application for leave for judicial review nor had they filed a sworn statement because according to the email sent to the Assistant Registrar, Her Honour Kayira, the documents for the inter partes application were not brought to their attention by the person who accepted service from the Applicants.

The Court must be quick to point out that this kind of conduct is deplorable especially where matters of such significance as the present one are concerned. The rules are very clear that supervising Counsel must take responsibility for the acts or omissions of clerical officers in the legal house. This applies squarely to the Attorney General’s Chambers as well. It is imperative that the Attorney General’s Chambers should ensure that best practices are adopted to avert a scenario such as the present one recurring.

  • Newsletter, Judicial Institute for Africa

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Costs order a lesson about ‘frivolous’ Covid-19 claims – labour court
As ‘moral Covid19’ infects Namibia, even legal profession touched by ‘Fishrot’ bribery scandal

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Carmel Rickard writes... via email. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Tags

CCMA (3) chief justice (3) Commercial court (2) constitution (5) constitutional and human rights division (3) constitutional court (4) constitutional rights (5) corruption (3) Court of Appeal (4) Covid-19 (6) COVID-19 regulations (3) damages (3) death penalty (5) dismissal (2) Employment law (6) eSwatini (2) Gauteng (3) Ghana (3) high court (23) Judge John Mativo (2) judicial independence (3) judicial review (3) Judicial Service Commission (3) jurisdiction (3) Kenya (15) Law Society of Kenya (3) Lesotho (5) magistrate (5) Malawi (8) Namibia (13) Rwanda (2) SA (4) SA Constitutional Court (2) SADC Tribunal (2) SA Labour Court (2) security forces (4) sentencing (4) South Africa (4) Supreme Court (11) Tanzania (7) torture (4) Uganda (9) UK (2) Zambia (6) Zimbabwe (14)

Recent Posts

  • Preserve your independence, court urges Namibia’s election commission 19 July 2020
  • African Court tells Tanzania: your constitution violates basic rights 16 July 2020
  • Government’s ‘contempt’ raised in challenge to Tanzania’s bail-ban laws 22 May 2020
  • Malawi appeal court judges set new election standards 22 May 2020
  • What orders did the court issue in the case brought by the family of Collins Khosa? 16 May 2020

Archive

Site by Neogek
Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress
 Logo Header Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

Subscribe to Carmel Rickard writes... via email. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.