Skip to content
Carmel Rickard writes…
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Site Search

A court order is not ‘a mere suggestion’ – judge

  • 15 August 201917 August 2019
  • by Carmel Rickard

Nambasi V Khan Investments Ltd (Miscellaneous Application No. 602 of 2018) [2019] UGHCCD 126 (28 June 2019);
High Court, Kampala, Uganda

Read judgment

This case, in Uganda’s high court, followed an earlier matter in which the Assistant Registrar ordered that a truck should be ‘attached before judgment’ as security for the appearance of the respondent. But rather than doing so, the respondent simply sold the vehicle to a third party. This was despite the fact that orders by the court’s assistant registrar are equivalent to a judicial order. The court heard that the respondent ‘disobeyed the court order and sold off the motor vehicle which amounts to contempt of court’.

Judge Ssekaana Musa was not impressed with the respondent’s approach:

A party who walks through the justice door with a court order in his hands must be assured that the order will be obeyed by those to whom it is directed.

A court order is not a mere suggestion or an opinion or a point of view. It is a directive that is issued after much thought and with circumspection. It must therefore be complied with and it is in the interest of every person that this remains the case. To see it any other way is to open the door to chaos and anarchy and this court will not be the one to open that door. If one is dissatisfied with an order of the court, the avenues for challenging it are also set out in the law. Defiance is not an option.

  • Newsletter, Judicial Institute for Africa (Jifa), 15 August 2019

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Mentally ill man can’t be returned to Sierra Leone – UK courts
High Court judge condemns SCA precedent in horrific rape appeal

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Carmel Rickard writes... via email. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Tags

CCMA (3) chief justice (3) Commercial court (2) constitution (5) constitutional and human rights division (3) constitutional court (4) constitutional rights (5) corruption (3) Court of Appeal (4) Covid-19 (6) COVID-19 regulations (3) damages (3) death penalty (5) dismissal (2) Employment law (6) eSwatini (2) Gauteng (3) Ghana (3) high court (23) Judge John Mativo (2) judicial independence (3) judicial review (3) Judicial Service Commission (3) jurisdiction (3) Kenya (15) Law Society of Kenya (3) Lesotho (5) magistrate (5) Malawi (8) Namibia (13) Rwanda (2) SA (4) SA Constitutional Court (2) SADC Tribunal (2) SA Labour Court (2) security forces (4) sentencing (4) South Africa (4) Supreme Court (11) Tanzania (7) torture (4) Uganda (9) UK (2) Zambia (6) Zimbabwe (14)

Recent Posts

  • Preserve your independence, court urges Namibia’s election commission 19 July 2020
  • African Court tells Tanzania: your constitution violates basic rights 16 July 2020
  • Government’s ‘contempt’ raised in challenge to Tanzania’s bail-ban laws 22 May 2020
  • Malawi appeal court judges set new election standards 22 May 2020
  • What orders did the court issue in the case brought by the family of Collins Khosa? 16 May 2020

Archive

Site by Neogek
Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress
 Logo Header Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

Subscribe to Carmel Rickard writes... via email. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.